Vegan Product Audit Process
The route involves selecting variants, preparing origin evidence and review by the actual programme owner. Consultancy preparation does not authorise logo use.
Follow the hidden processing input
In a hypothetical drink, filtration or clarification uses an aid absent from the consumer label. Ask the manufacturer for material identity, origin and actual process use and link the answer to the product version. Review shared-contact controls and the chosen programme’s relevant testing responsibilities. Do not call the product accepted because its advertised ingredients are botanical.
Programme conditions and worked assessment
Example: A business sends ten product names without formula versions or shared-material identities. Build a product/formula/supplier matrix. Direct origin and processing questions to the relevant manufacturer and attach each reply to the correct material. Explain testing responsibilities and shared-production controls. Answer programme questions with versioned records, then compare the final licence list and label permission with the finished products. Downloading a logo or paying an application fee is not permission by itself; keep approval and subsequent changes explicitly recorded.
Evidence and authority boundary
The Vegan Society is an example source; no Kayra/QRS programme authority is asserted. Missing supplier information affects timing; neither allergen freedom nor a positive outcome is guaranteed.
Official sources
Checked: 3 October 2026. Worked examples are hypothetical evidence-planning cases, not customer transactions.