← Main service guide

MDR Certification and Consultancy Provider

Adapted: 8 October 2026. Practical guidance reviewed: 15 September 2026.

Direct answer

Compare MDR providers by their device technology, clinical evidence and technical-file competence. If a notified body is required, verify its designation and device or procedure scope in the official EU directory and with the body. Separate consultancy, testing and body assessment fees and outputs; a consultant or ISO certificate cannot replace the required body's decision.

Practical questions for this decision

Who is the manufacturer when a contract-made device is sold under our brand?

Determine how the device is marketed and each party's MDR role. Own-brand supply may create manufacturer duties; assess specific contractual arrangements against the relevant provisions. Clarify technical file access, quality systems and post-market responsibilities. Do not treat the factory's certificate as transferring all your duties.

Are publications about a similar device sufficient clinical evidence for ours?

Explain relevance to intended use and technical and biological characteristics. Assess equivalence conditions and data access; use for the same disease alone is insufficient. Develop a device-specific clinical evaluation and additional-data plan. Do not assume clinical investigation is universally required or universally unnecessary.

Read the complete practical guide

Related sub-guides

QUICK QUOTE FORM

Tell us what you need and our specialists will contact you.

The exact records for MDR Certification and Consultancy Provider depend on the confirmed scope. Current, consistent and traceable information reduces avoidable revisions.

QUICK QUOTE FORM

Tell us what you need and our specialists will contact you.

A telephone number is required. You may leave the email field blank.

Your information is used only to respond to this enquiry. Privacy notice

WhatsApp