TRTürkçe
ENEnglish
AZAzərbaycanca
UZO‘zbekcha
ARالعربية
FRFrançais
DEDeutsch
RUРусский
Who decides EN 1090 conformity, declaration and project use?
Separate the notified body’s assigned assessment from the manufacturer’s production control and declaration. Check actual designation and certificate scope; a body number or consultant’s file does not approve every component or project.
Identify the decision before choosing a decision-maker
First define the construction component and applicable conformity system. The manufacturer controls the product and production information; a notified body performs only the assessment tasks assigned to it by the relevant rules and designation. The applicable declaration and CE duties belong to the manufacturer after the required work, rather than to a preparation consultant.
Check the body’s current entry and tasks through the Commission’s official notified-body route, together with the scope and conditions of the actual offered assessment. NANDO lists identification numbers and notified tasks. A familiar logo, accreditation claim or listed number alone does not demonstrate that a particular product, procedure and manufacturing site are covered.
A listed body and another plant’s certificate are not enough
Conditional example: a company plans aluminium structural components at a second plant, but presents a production-control certificate describing steel manufacture at its first plant. It also shows the issuing body’s identification number. Compare legal entity, site, material, operations and certificate scope with the planned supply instead of assuming the number extends the certificate.
Ask the issuer to clarify the actual certificate and assessment coverage, and check whether its current designation covers the required tasks. Identify the further assessment or production-control action actually needed; do not infer refusal or acceptance from this example alone. Kayra cannot alter the issuer’s scope decision or certify the second plant by rewriting a file.
Keep product conformity and project decisions distinct
Design responsibility, fabrication controls, independent assessment and declaration must have named owners in the actual project file. Record who supplies design inputs and which characteristics the manufacturer declares. An inspection or welding-related document must be used within its real purpose; it is not a replacement for all EN 1090 conformity tasks.
Kayra can coordinate preparation and evidence requests while the designated body decides its own assigned assessment and certification. The manufacturer retains its controls and market duties. Those responsible for the construction project determine suitability for its design and installation conditions; neither a consultancy contract nor a production-control certificate approves the whole project.
Related service guides
- ← Return to the main document guide
- 01How to Obtain EN 1090Open guide →
- 02EN 1090: choosing conformity and preparation servicesOpen guide →
- 03Documents and Records Required for EN 1090Open guide →
- 04EN 1090 Cost and TimescaleOpen guide →
- 05EN 1090 Enquiry and ValidityOpen guide →
- 06EN 1090 Renewal and SurveillanceOpen guide →
- 07EN 1090 Audit ProcessOpen guide →
- 08Is EN 1090 Mandatory? Requirements ExplainedOpen guide →
- 09Frequently Asked Questions About EN 1090Open guide →
Tell us what you need and our specialists will contact you.
Share the intended component and site, proposed body, actual scope documents and requested assessment task to define the responsibilities.